From Michael E Caloroso Sent Sun, Jul 1st 2018, 19:05
> Thanks for the personal attack, Paul. I really appreciate you taking my g= eneral and > inctrovertible statement about the impact of these kinds of tariffs and t= rying to spin it > as hyperbole and doomsaying. If you go back read my statement you=E2=80= =99ll see I > specifically said nobody could know the specific impact on Moog=E2=80=99s= business. That was not a personal attack. That was a professional rebuke. No one could know the impact on Moog's business. But did you not notice that cry of "the tariffs are falling the tariffs are falling" did not come from any official Moog Music source, nor was there any mention of such concern on their website or their discussion forum? Like Paul, we engineers don't take lightly to chicken little panic statements without any careful study into the facts. When this happens and you get reminded that the facts do not support the article at all, you resort to ad hominem tactics by twisting Paul's rebuke to fit the definition of a "personal attack" because he dared to verify the facts. We engineers also do not take lightly to shaming tactics that should had stayed in grade school where they belong. It's amazing how people can attach a photo of Moog employees to a doomsaying article and believe it is must be legitimate. You bought the bait, hook line & sinker. Trust me, you were hardly the only one. The sky is NOT FALLING. Sent from my iFakeNewsIncinerator, MC