(idm) Re: no Xmas for John Cage

From R. Lim
Sent Mon, Aug 23rd 1999, 21:46

On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, elk bot wrote:

> Considering that his music wasnt very good (his pieces for prepared
> piano being an exception), has anyone ever considered how convenient
> it was for Mr. Cage to adopt the philosophy that "music is simply the
> noise you choose to pay attention to"?

Interesting that you should mention his prepared piano stuff... contrast
Sonatas and Interludes with some of his seminal percussion work (of which
there is a nice comp on Wergo w/1st Construction in Metal and all the
hits) and you'll get a perfect illustration of the phenomenon that Drew
was talking about (ref.  noise->melody, melody->noise).

The rest of the comment above sort of typifies the misunderstanding of
Cage's music that clouds discussions of his significance, much like the
cheap cigar smoke that accumulates wherever 1st year MBA students gather.  
To my knowledge, Cage never went the nihilistic/cynic route and said
nothing/everything is music.  Rather, he expanded what could be thought of
musical source material (e.g. "notes," and in a general sense, what could
comprise a score, a performer/"musician", etc).

I always thought of the Fluxus "composers" as having taken Cage's ideas to
their most extreme, ridiculous (and non-musical) conclusions.  And God
bless 'em for it.  Sample score paraphrase (for a piece called "Polish",
can't remember its author off hand): take a violin and polish it.  

None of this, of course, downplays the significance of Cage in art music
of the second half of the 20th century.  In fact, IDM sort of
fundamentally depends on his theories (to a much greater degree than it
does to Stockhausen, Parmegiani or any other conservatory guy
name-checked in "Invisible Jukebox").

For the person who asked, the best starting point is probably the 25 Year
Retrospective Concert 3CD set on Wergo.  The reason behind the occasion is
somewhat obscure (I think it was meant as the 25 year anniversary of his
entry into composition or something), but it includes a plurality of his
most significant early works.  Everything is done up by a virtual
who's-who of performers and I can't imagine why it wouldn't be considered
to be wall-to-wall listenable (even pleasurable) by a crowd raised on
Autechre.

 -rob